![]() ![]() Here the person who has “reached out” by making the counseling appointment answers many of the questions in a way that suggests they are fine and there really is no problem. Adding the accumulated shame of childhood with having to admit an inability in overcoming addictions to alcohol, drugs, sex, food, or gambling – to name a few – gives us an idea of the magnitude of the problem one can have with asking for help.Ĭan you hear the voice of shame? “See – now you are really proving what a loser you are!” Even when the pain is great enough to bring someone in for counseling… they are often compelled to manage the impression of the counselor to the extent that it can actually sabotage the assessment process. Often, it is only when the pain becomes unbearable that we begin to even consider reaching out… we call this “hitting bottom”. So we try overcoming addiction on our own… But nothing works – we feel even more demoralized. Furthermore, the infection of shame makes it very difficult to ask for help. ![]() If we grew up with a significant amount of woundedness… we are likely to be better at acting-out than we are at reaching-out because it was either not taught or not allowed. Reaching out for help with such things as overcoming addiction and depression is a neural network that we are not born with. INTERNET ICEBERG DIAGRAM SERIESThe first thing in overcoming addiction, codependency, depression, and anxiety is to accept that one cannot recover alone and reach out to others for help… Thawing the Iceberg Series Online Courses If one plunges headlong into their woundedness they will be compelled to seek comfort and relief in the only way they know how – a return to their addiction of choice. There is much to be done and it cannot be done all at once. Overcoming addiction and codependency is easy “all you have to do is change your whole life…” The transition from the old life to the new is a period of limbo where the past is too painful to return to and the future is too uncertain to feel comfortable about. Yet, the conceptualization of the digital divide as impeded access to content may be key in terms of ensuring real participation and catering for the long-term implications of digital technologies.Home » The Iceberg Model » Overcoming Addiction, The Iceberg Part Four This is an aspect that is rarely addressed in the global digital divide discussions, even in comprehensive analyses and political initiatives such as the World Summit on the Information Society. It is maintained that as the practice of intervention intensifies in cyberspace, multiple and far-reaching points of control outside formal legal institutions are created, threatening the availability of public goods and making the pursuit of public objectives difficult. The increasing barriers to content, though of a diverse nature, all relate to some governance characteristics inherent in cyberspace, such as global spillover of local decisions, regulation through code, and proliferation of self- and co-regulatory models. These divides are drawn not at the entry to the net but within the net itself, and limit access to content. ![]() ![]() Without understating the first two digital divides, it is argued that as the Internet becomes more sophisticated and more integrated into economic, social, and cultural processes, a “third” generation of divides becomes critical. Acknowledging the complexity of this inequality, the article aims at analyzing the disparities beyond the connectivity and skills barriers. It critically explores the predominant notion, its evolution and measurement, as well as the policies that have been advanced to bridge the digital divide. The article seeks a re-conceptualization of the global digital divide debate. It suggests that a key to understanding the heterogeneity of workshop contributions is to attend to the performativity of governance and governance research, the analytic status of ‘technology’ and the conceptual and methodological devices we use to research it. However, while the field has grown with the proliferation and use of such technologies, its scope and focus are far from clear: what counts as governance in settings, in which people increasingly interact through networked digital media? How can we think about interaction, coordination and control in these environments? What is the role of technologies in creating and maintaining regimes of governance? And what methodologies and methods are appropriate for understanding them? This paper draws on an interdisciplinary workshop held at Oxford University to have a closer look at some of these issues. Over the past decade, researchers have become increasingly interested in the theoretical and practical issue of governance as it relates to information and communication technologies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |